<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abortion: a woman’s right to choose&#8230;what?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bigbfiles.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/abortion-a-woman%e2%80%99s-right-to-choosewhat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bigbfiles.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/abortion-a-woman%e2%80%99s-right-to-choosewhat/</link>
	<description>Big B Files</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:41:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://bigbfiles.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/abortion-a-woman%e2%80%99s-right-to-choosewhat/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigbfiles.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-978</guid>
		<description>I think that it is a bit intellectually dishonest of you to lump everyone expressing a prochoice opinion into the group of people who want &quot;abortion on demand and without any restrictions.&quot;  I am certain that there are many many people in this country who feel that it is not the place of government to dictate to a woman what she does with her body and, at the same time, would never make that choice or (in the case of men) would never put their partners in a position to make that choice.
   While I do not consider myself the defender of the prochoice position, or consider you the defender of the anti-abortion position, I would ask a question along the same lines as your post above:  Why does the anti-abortion movement claim the mantle of being &quot;pro-life&quot; when the vast majority of the movement also approves of capital punishment?  I am not assuming that you do, I am merely making an observation that I feel mirrors yours about the language used in this debate.  If, as has been espoused many times by the anti-abortion movement, the taking of life is the soul province of God, then how is it not hypocritical to disapprove of abortion and approve and support the government&#039;s taking of life, subverting the province of God?  

Just wondering, just found your web site, I hope that this could start useful discussions about many topics...thanks for the chance to comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is a bit intellectually dishonest of you to lump everyone expressing a prochoice opinion into the group of people who want &#8220;abortion on demand and without any restrictions.&#8221;  I am certain that there are many many people in this country who feel that it is not the place of government to dictate to a woman what she does with her body and, at the same time, would never make that choice or (in the case of men) would never put their partners in a position to make that choice.<br />
   While I do not consider myself the defender of the prochoice position, or consider you the defender of the anti-abortion position, I would ask a question along the same lines as your post above:  Why does the anti-abortion movement claim the mantle of being &#8220;pro-life&#8221; when the vast majority of the movement also approves of capital punishment?  I am not assuming that you do, I am merely making an observation that I feel mirrors yours about the language used in this debate.  If, as has been espoused many times by the anti-abortion movement, the taking of life is the soul province of God, then how is it not hypocritical to disapprove of abortion and approve and support the government&#8217;s taking of life, subverting the province of God?  </p>
<p>Just wondering, just found your web site, I hope that this could start useful discussions about many topics&#8230;thanks for the chance to comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
